|
GM Soybeans with Health Boosters
Genetically engineered soybean oil could be
an effective alternative to fish oil as a source of
heart-healthy omega-3 fatty acids. Researchers have reported
increased levels of omega-3 eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) in red
blood cells. These findings were presented at the American
Heart Association's Scientific Sessions 2009.
A few plants, particularly soybeans,
produce oils that contain alpha-linolenic acid (ALA)- another
type of omega-3 fatty acid. The human body converts ALA to
stearidonic acid (SDA), but this is a very inefficient
process. The body converts SDA to EPA far more effectively,
resulting in more EPA per gram consumed.
The researchers bypassed conversion of
ALA-to-SDA in the human body by doing so in the soybean plant.
They developed the new soybean variety by inserting one gene
from another plant and one from a fungus to allow the soybean
plant to produce SDA. The result is soybean oil enriched in
SDA, which when consumed allows the body to produce more EPA
than if it started with ALA.
Normally fish oil contains two forms of
heart-healthy, long-chain omega-3s, EPA and DHA. Eating fish
containing these omega-3 fatty acids has been associated with
a decreased risk of cardiovascular disease.
The soybean variety used by researchers has
been developed by Monsanto, the agricultural biotechnology
company. The company has asked the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration to grant its new oil GRAS (generally recognize
as safe) status, a classification that means the agency
regards the chemical or substance safe when added to foods.
Guide to GM-free food products
The 2010 Truefood Guide released by Greenpeace recently, which
rates over one thousand of Australia’s top food and beverage
brands for the presence of GM ingredients, claims four leading
food brands-- Nestlé, Foster’s, Schweppes and Lindt-- are
turning their back on genetically modified (GM) ingredients –
for the Australian market.
The Biological Farmers’ Association claims these four brands
have undertaken to keep their Australian brands free from GM
ingredients, joining other prominent Australian brands like
Milo, Uncle Toby’s cereal, VB and Peters Ice Cream.
The Association claimed that due to loose labelling laws in
Australia most foods aren’t required to declare GM ingredients
on labelling, and consumers end up unwittingly consuming GMOs.
BFA said that the move by four major brands to go GMO- free is
indicative that consumer concern about GMOs is not lessening
and the True Food Guide comes in handy for consumers.

GM rice in Bangladesh by
2012
Bangladesh will grow the
genetically modified (GM) rice variety known as golden rice by
2012. The rice variety, rich in vitamin 'A', will help meet
the deficiency of this particular vitamin, lack of which
causes childhood blindness and weakens the immune system. The
Manila-based International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) in
an article posted on its web site recently said the golden
rice would be grown in Bangladesh and the Philippines by 2012.
The test production of the
variety developed by genetically modifying BRRI-29 - a
high-yielding variety of rice, being produced in the country
for long with significant success will begin in a confined
laboratory by 2009 end. IRRI has already done trial production
of the golden rice in many countries.
GE cows with therapeutic properties
AgResearch plans to alter the make-up of
cows, sheep and goats to produce medicinal super-milk by
mixing human and animal DNA. The Crown research institute is
pushing ahead with the plans, despite being embroiled in a
court battle with GE-Free New Zealand over similar proposals.
The Environmental Risk Management Authority is calling for
submissions on the AgResearch application, which involves
creating goats, sheep and cows at Ruakara in Hamilton.
A High Court ruling in June has prevented
AgResearch from pursuing four similar applications that also
sought to conduct the research with a view to developing
health products. The research agency will fight the case,
filed by GE-Free NZ, at the Court of Appeal in January 2010.
AgResearch wanted to develop genetically
engineered animals, which would be contained outside its
premises, to produce milk products with therapeutic qualities.
It would use human DNA, made synthetically and available
commercially from the United States, to first create test-tube
animals in a laboratory. The researchers hoped that the
animals would then be able to produce milk and therapeutic
proteins.
In its application, AgResearch said the
cancer drug Herceptin was an example of a therapeutic protein
that could be produced more efficiently through research. If
granted, the application would put New Zealand at the
forefront of an industry and could attract the international
market.

Approval procedure for genetically
engineered maize LY038 stopped for safety reasons?
After the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
raised safety concerns related to the Renessens (a Monsanto
and Cargill international joint venture) GM variety of maize,
the company withdrew its application for market authorisation
of GM maize- LY038. Though the decision was taken in April
2009, it was made public recently.
The EFSA raised some crucial points
relating to a possible impact on human health and the
Authority in its communication to the company, even requested
repeating animal feeding trials with rats. Significantly, the
EFSA has never asked for such a procedure before.
In the feeding trials rats had shown some
significant changes in blood parameters as well as in their
urine. But this study was rejected by the EFSA for major
methodological deficiencies. Several other EU member states
had also raised health risk related issues. In 2005 experts
from New Zealand expressed serious concerns for human health
if the maize were ever to enter the food chain.
However in its letter to the EFSA, the
company gave economic reasons for its decision to withdraw its
application. There was no mention of safety concerns.
Significantly, the product is already authorised in US,
Canada, Australia and New Zealand.
Decreasing rice
variety in China
China had 46,000 rice varieties in the
1950s, but this plummeted to just 1,000 in 2006, according to
a Chinese study published in November issue of journal
BioScience. This dramatic decrease in rice varieties
raises fears about the country's food security and
biodiversity.
The research used a variety of
environmental indicators like forest coverage and water
quality to examine China's progress since parties to the
Convention on Biological Diversity agreed in 2002 to
significantly reduce biodiversity loss by 2010. According to
the study, China's grasslands have declined by 15,000 square
km per year over the past 30 years.
Water quality in marine ecosystems though
has improved by more than four per cent per year from 2001 to
2007. The area of China's forests has increased from 13 per
cent to 18 per cent in 2003, and forest growing stock — the
volume of trees in an area that have more than a certain
diameter at chest height — has increased by over 40 per cent.

|