Home     |     About Us     |      Focus Areas     |     Publications     |    Get  Involved    |      Contact Us    |     Donate 

CONCERN

GE Contamination: A Global Scenario

Samir Kumar Mohapatra

According to the GM Contamination Register Report-2005 by Gene Watch UK and Greenpeace International, contamination has been found to arise at every stage of development- from the lab to the field.

GE Contamination i.e., food, feed or a related wild species containing unintended genetically engineered (GE) material from a GE crop or other organism, has become a widespread and serious issue raising global concern. The global concern is due to the fact that GE contamination involves serious safety issues. This is why, Gene Watch UK and Greenpeace International have brought out a report on GE contamination on a global scale (GM Contamination Register Report-2005). The Report has recorded cases of not only contamination but also illegal plantings or releases of GE crops, and negative agricultural side-effects.

According to the Report, , there were 88 cases of contamination, 17 illegal releases and eight reports of negative agricultural side-effects during the first ten years of commercial GE crop cultivation (1996-2005). And, this has spanned over 39 countries in five continents. Maize, soybean, rapeseed oil and cotton were the four major commercial crops involved in either a contamination incident, an illegal release or some negative agricultural side-effect. Apart from these, grass, plum, potato, rice, sugar beet, tomato etc. were also involved in such incidents. Even the food aids supplied to countries in need were also found contaminated with GE ingredient.

According to the Report, GE contamination has been found to arise at every stage of development- from the laboratory to the field. Interestingly, in majority of the cases, the major cause of seed contamination appeared to be cross-pollination in the field. Poor quality control measures and failure of post-harvest segregation also played an important role in food, feed or sseed contamination. Cases of misidentification, failures in inspection and enforcement of controls on field trials, lack of awareness of proper controls in laboratories were also important factors. Poor quality control led to the growing of Syngenta’s unapproved Bt 10 maize for four years in the USA and its exports to Ireland, continental Europe and Japan. 

In the absence of a global monitoring system, it becomes very difficult to obtain information regarding GE contamination. Those who are privy to the sensitive information relating to GE crops do not put the relevant data in the public domain, making it very difficult to detect contamination. Even the biotechnology industry is not forthcoming about the issue. There are also a number of potentially debilitating genes being introduced into crops – coding for drugs or other biologically active compounds – that could easily escape detection. For example, in 2005, 12 tonnes of GE peas with a bean alpha-amylase inhibitor gene had to be destroyed when it was belatedly discovered in their development that the GE version of the alpha-amylase inhibitor could cause an allergic reaction in mice. It is possible that these peas could have gone astray in due course of time and entered the food chain.

×Genenews HomeŘ                                                                                                                   NextŘ